mirror of
https://github.com/TrentSPalmer/attentionspanhistory.git
synced 2025-07-11 22:43:15 -07:00
initial commit
This commit is contained in:
61
content/battle-in-the-middle-ages.md
Normal file
61
content/battle-in-the-middle-ages.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
||||
Title: Battle In The Middle Ages
|
||||
Date: 2021-07-27
|
||||
Category: War
|
||||
|
||||
There were three type of battles in Europe in the Middle Ages:
|
||||
|
||||
1. [Raids](#raids)
|
||||
1. [Sieges](#sieges)
|
||||
1. [Field-Battles](#field-battles)
|
||||
|
||||
There were two types of soldiers in Europe in the Middle Ages:
|
||||
|
||||
1. cavalry
|
||||
2. and infantry.
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="raids">Raids</h2>
|
||||
Infantry tended to not be used in raids, because horses had
|
||||
the advantage in speed and mobility.
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="sieges">Sieges</h2>
|
||||
Cavalry were not much use in sieges, but when infantry were not
|
||||
available, the cavalry could obviously dismount.
|
||||
|
||||
Later in the Middle Ages, infantry began using CrossBows, which
|
||||
were easy to use, and effective in sieges. And so, when infantry
|
||||
were available for sieges, they would often use CrossBows, and
|
||||
would often be Mercenaries.
|
||||
|
||||
<h2 id="field-battles">Field-Battles</h2>
|
||||
In set-piece battles, cavalry and infantry could work together.
|
||||
|
||||
For instance cavalry could not charge infantry that were in tight formation
|
||||
with spears. But cavalry were useful for attacking the enemy's flanks,
|
||||
and for pursuit in the case of a rout. However, for economic reasons,
|
||||
most field battles were fought between cavalry because it was too
|
||||
expensive to muster both cavalry and infantry most of the time.
|
||||
|
||||
## Crusades
|
||||
The Crusades demonstrate that although most field battles in
|
||||
Europe during the Middle Ages were fought between Cavalry, the warriors
|
||||
of that age were capable of more sophisticated tactics.
|
||||
|
||||
Here it should be noted, that because lands to the East tended to
|
||||
be more arid, the opponents fighting against the European Crusaders
|
||||
were more skilled on horseback and with the bow and arrow. Eastern-style
|
||||
fighting was much more cavalry-oriented.
|
||||
|
||||
What tipped the scale in favour of the Crusaders in certain battles
|
||||
that they won, was the fact that the CrossBow could outrange the bow-and-arrow.
|
||||
|
||||
So, the Crusaders would line up infantry with edged-weapons in front,
|
||||
behind them would be CrossBow Infantry, with Cavalry protecting the flanks.
|
||||
The edged-weapon infantry would protect the CrossBowMen, who would shoot
|
||||
over the top and protect the edged-weapon infantry from enemy harrassment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended
|
||||
This blog post is inspired by
|
||||
[Wittenberg To Westphalia Podcast](https://wittenbergtowestphaliapodcast.weebly.com/){:target="_blank"}, specifically
|
||||
[Episode 38](https://wittenbergtowestphaliapodcast.weebly.com/blog/episode-38-warfare-in-the-middle-ages-part-1){:target="_blank"},
|
||||
[Episode 39](https://wittenbergtowestphaliapodcast.weebly.com/blog/episode-39-what-is-war-baby-dont-hurt-me){:target="_blank"}, and
|
||||
[Episode 40](https://wittenbergtowestphaliapodcast.weebly.com/blog/episode-40-the-actual-war-bits){:target="_blank"}.
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user